Into the likelihood of kissing into the target, discover a life threatening communications between grandiose narcissism and you may fellow member sex, ? = .161, t = dos.819, p = .005. It telecommunications are shown in Fig 2. The simple hills for males (simple slope = 0.051., t = .007, p = .995) and you may people (simple slope = -0.011., t = -0.002, p = .999) just weren’t extreme. Grandiose narcissists didn’t show a heightened odds of kissing which have an attached target more just a single one (? = .068, t = step one.127, p = .261), recommending you to definitely grandiose narcissism wasn’t in the mate poaching getting a primary-title fling.
Grandiose narcissists usually report spouse poaching -especially for brand new quick-name . Yet not, a concern remains as to whether or not they see people in relationships a whole lot more worthy of desire than just people who find themselves unmarried. Widman and you may McNulty reason why grandiose narcissistic tendencies will be activated round the facts typically (for instance the mind-report of lifestyle frequency away from intimate choices), but not become activated whenever placed in a certain state. For this reason, it is possible one grandiose narcissists disclose a track record of engaging in spouse poaching, but do not always look for those who work in dating to get ideal mates. I checked-out this possibility inside five degree.
Partner poaching list.
For very long-label partner poaching, grandiose narcissism was a serious predictor for females (? = .306, t = 2.623, p = .010) and you will a somewhat significant predictor for men (? = .218, t = 1.725, p = .088). None of one’s Big Five variables were extreme. Grandiose narcissism was not a significant predictor out-of achievement at poaching towards a lot of time-identity for males (? = .120, t = 0.718, p = .476), nevertheless is for ladies (? = .340, t = dos.369, p = .021). Nothing of your additional factors were tall except for women’s neuroticism; whenever women have been more neurotic, it said more achievements at poaching for some time-name intimate matchmaking.
Abilities
Of great interest, grandiose narcissism was not with the partner poaching certainly one of males. That it result is in keeping with abilities reported of the Kardum and associates . Hence, it’s possible that grandiose narcissistic ladies are more frequently bad from mate poaching.
Content and you may process
There was a significant three-way interaction between grandiose narcissism, participant relationship status, and participant sex for the likelihood of pursuing the target for a relationship (? = .162, t = 2.666, p = .008). This three-way interaction is displayed in Fig 1. Data are plotted at ±1 SD from the mean of grandiose narcissism. The simple slope for attached men was significant (simple slope = .05, t = 9.24, 
p < .001), revealing that men in a relationship were more likely to pursue the target for a relationship at higher levels of grandiose narcissism. The simple slope for attached women (simple slope = -.04, t = -3.27, p = .001) revealed that women in a relationship were less likely to pursue the target for a relationship at higher levels of grandiose narcissism. The simple slope for single men was also significant (simple slope = -.02, t = -2.38, p = .02), revealing that single men were less interested in pursuing the target for a relationship at higher levels of grandiose narcissism. The simple slope for single women was not significant (simple slope = .024, t = 1.56, p = .12). With the exception of the slope differences between single women and attached men (t = -1.65, p = .10), the differences in slopes were all significant (ts ? -2.16, ps ? .03). The grandiose narcissism ? target relationship status interaction was not significant (? = .068, t = 1.127, p = .261), indicating that grandiose narcissism was not associated with mate poaching for a long-term affair.
